Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2013 - 2017
Chevrolet Captiva
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Captiva can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Captiva also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.7 - 4.02.2 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 163 - 282 HP167 - 258 HP
Torque: 246 - 450 NM230 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 13.8 seconds9.8 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.4 - 12.57.8 - 9.5
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.67 m
Width: 1.89 m1.85 m
Height: 1.85 m1.73 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 640 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1934 litres1577 litres
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity.
Toyota Land Cruiser has 163 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 357 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`928~ 2`411
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 28 600no data
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • roomier boot
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv