Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Toyota C-HR engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota C-HR consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus NX | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota C-HR might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 10 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 23 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |