Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 2 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 57 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 10 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 23 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota C-HR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |