Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Peugeot 3008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota C-HR) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 3008) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 1 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, but torque is 85 NM less than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 3008 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is smaller. Toyota C-HR and Peugeot 3008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1241 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 55 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |