Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is more dynamic to drive. Toyota C-HR engine produces 1 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota C-HR could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota C-HR consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`865 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`285 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 595 kg | |
| Toyota C-HR load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |