Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Toyota C-HR engine produces 25 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Toyota C-HR reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota C-HR consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Toyota C-HR over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota C-HR consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota C-HR is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota C-HR is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Toyota C-HR has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |