Toyota C-HR 2016 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 152 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 190 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.9 | 7.1 - 9.8 | |
|
Toyota C-HR petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota C-HR is larger, but lower. Toyota C-HR is 13 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota C-HR is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota C-HR has 301 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Toyota C-HR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota C-HR is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`898 | ~ 1`836 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota C-HR has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |