Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 91 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 27 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 2.07 m | |
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 51 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 32 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |