Suzuki SX4 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Suzuki SX4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1269 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki SX4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`885 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`085 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 655 kg | 570 kg | |
| Suzuki SX4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |