Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Jimny engine produces 51 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Suzuki Jimny over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller. Suzuki Jimny is 62 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |