Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 13 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 26 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 7 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 216 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 392 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |