Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 166 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 225 NM | 224 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 4 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 1 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.3 | |
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
680 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Toyota RAV4 2006 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 34 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 586 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 402 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`110 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |