Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 26 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |