Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 166 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 14.4 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 9.4 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 35 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 402 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`888 | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |