Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru B9 Tribeca) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is more dynamic to drive. Subaru B9 Tribeca engine produces 102 HP more power than Ford Ranger, but torque is 33 NM less than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Subaru B9 Tribeca reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru B9 Tribeca could require 510 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru B9 Tribeca consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 8 cm wider, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Subaru B9 Tribeca has 1050 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 1.6 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Subaru B9 Tribeca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |