Smart ForFour 2004 vs Renault Twingo 2012

 
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Renault Twingo
2012 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP85 HP
Torque: 160 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds11.2 seconds
Renault Twingo is a more dynamic driving.
Smart ForFour engine produces 17 HP less power than Renault Twingo, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Twingo. Due to the lower power, Smart ForFour reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.63.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km4.7 l/100km
The Renault Twingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Smart ForFour consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Smart ForFour could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForFour consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle1170 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1290 km on highway
810 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Renault Twingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Renault Twingo 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Renault Twingo 2012 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m3.69 m
Width: 1.68 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Smart ForFour is 6 cm longer than the Renault Twingo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres165 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres959 litres
Smart ForFour has 103 litres more trunk space than the Renault Twingo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 49 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Smart ForFour can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4501`425
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 18003600
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Renault Twingo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv