Smart ForFour 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Smart ForFour is more dynamic to drive. Smart ForFour engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Smart ForFour reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
| By specification Smart ForFour consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Smart ForFour could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Smart ForFour is smaller. Smart ForFour is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForFour is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
910 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Smart ForFour has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Smart ForFour has 48 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForFour has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForFour has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |