Smart ForFour 2004 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2002

 
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Volkswagen Lupo
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 109 HP125 HP
Torque: 145 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds8.5 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving.
Smart ForFour engine produces 16 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Smart ForFour reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Smart ForFour is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Smart ForFour consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Smart ForFour over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForFour consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle460 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway610 km on highway
690 km with real consumption450 km with real consumption
Smart ForFour gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m3.53 m
Width: 1.68 m1.64 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Smart ForFour is larger, but slightly lower.
Smart ForFour is 22 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres830 litres
Smart ForFour has more luggage capacity.
Smart ForFour has 138 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 80 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4501`320
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForFour has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 18001000
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv