Smart ForFour 2004 vs Renault Twingo 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Renault Twingo
2012 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.51.1 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 64 - 177 HP75 - 133 HP
Torque: 92 - 230 NM107 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 15.3 seconds8.7 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 6.83.4 - 6.7
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Twingo. On average, Smart ForFour equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m3.69 m
Width: 1.68 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Smart ForFour is 6 cm longer than the Renault Twingo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres165 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres959 litres
Smart ForFour has 103 litres more trunk space than the Renault Twingo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 49 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`450~ 1`392
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 18003200
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Renault Twingo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv