Smart ForFour 2004 vs Peugeot 207 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Peugeot 207
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.51.4 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 64 - 177 HP68 - 156 HP
Torque: 92 - 230 NM120 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 15.3 seconds8 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 6.84.2 - 6.8
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 207. On average, Smart ForFour equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m4.05 m
Width: 1.68 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Smart ForFour is smaller.
Smart ForFour is 30 cm shorter than the Peugeot 207, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForFour is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres923 litres
Smart ForFour has 2 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 207. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 207 (by 13 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 207.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`450~ 1`670
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 18003000
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv