Smart ForFour 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 177 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 230 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.8 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Smart ForFour equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Smart ForFour is smaller. Smart ForFour is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForFour is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
910 litres | 760 litres | |
| Smart ForFour has 232 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`450 | ~ 1`497 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForFour has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |