Smart ForFour 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Mitsubishi Colt
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.51.1 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 64 - 177 HP68 - 150 HP
Torque: 92 - 230 NM100 - 210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 15.3 seconds8 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 6.84.4 - 6.8
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Smart ForFour equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m3.86 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.55 m
Smart ForFour is smaller.
Smart ForFour is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForFour is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres760 litres
Smart ForFour has 232 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 150 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`450~ 1`497
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 20001600
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mitsubishi Colt has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv