Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 37 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |