Skoda Superb 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 193 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Superb engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 6 2010 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Superb is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 84 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Superb can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`113 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Superb has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |