Skoda Octavia 2000 vs Skoda Octavia 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia 2000 engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Octavia 2004, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Octavia 2004. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia 2000 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia 2000 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2000 is smaller. Skoda Octavia 2000 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia 2004, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia 2000 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia 2000 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia 2004, which means Skoda Octavia 2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.3/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |