Skoda Octavia 2006 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia 2006 engine produces 85 HP more power than Skoda Octavia 2000, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Skoda Octavia 2000. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia 2000 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Octavia 2006 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Octavia 2006 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia 2000 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Bora, Volkswagen Beetle | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia 2006 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Octavia 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Skoda Octavia 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2006 is larger. Skoda Octavia 2006 is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia 2000, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia 2006 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia 2006 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means Skoda Octavia 2006 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Skoda Octavia 2006 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia 2000 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia 2006, so Skoda Octavia 2006 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 5.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |