Skoda Octavia 2005 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2005 is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia 2005 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Octavia 2000, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Octavia 2000. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia 2005 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia 2005 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia 2000 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Bora, Volkswagen Beetle | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2005 is larger. Skoda Octavia 2005 is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia 2000, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia 2005 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia 2005 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means Skoda Octavia 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 5.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |