Skoda Octavia 2004 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
Skoda Octavia 2004 is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia 2004 engine produces 14 HP more power than Skoda Octavia 2000, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Skoda Octavia 2000. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.1 | |
The Skoda Octavia 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Octavia 2004 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Skoda Octavia 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia 2000 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Skoda Octavia 2004 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Skoda Octavia 2004 1.6 engine Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Skoda Octavia 2004 is larger. Skoda Octavia 2004 is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia 2000, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia 2004 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 528 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1328 litres | |
Skoda Octavia 2004 has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia 2004 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Octavia 2000. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia 2004 (by 22 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia 2004 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means Skoda Octavia 2004 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 5.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |