Skoda Octavia 2004 vs Citroen C5 2008
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 127 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 25 HP less power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Citroen C5. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | Used also on Peugeot 407 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Octavia 2004 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is smaller. Skoda Octavia is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 121 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. The Citroen C5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 1.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |