Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Kamiq) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Qashqai) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kamiq engine produces 43 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kamiq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.5 | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kamiq consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Skoda Kamiq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Kamiq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Skoda Kamiq is smaller. Skoda Kamiq is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kamiq is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1447 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Skoda Kamiq has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kamiq is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`289 kg | 1`393 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 146 kg | 592 kg | |
| Skoda Kamiq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |