Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Kamiq) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Kamiq engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 43 NM more than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kamiq is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Kamiq has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |