Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 207 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Skoda Kamiq and Mazda CX-3 have the same engine power, but Skoda Kamiq torque is 43 NM more than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Audi Q3, Audi A1, Skoda Scala | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kamiq is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Kamiq has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`808 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 20 200 | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |