Seat Exeo 2011 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 105 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 172 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Exeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2008 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Dacia Logan 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is larger, but lower. Seat Exeo is 37 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Exeo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
833 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Seat Exeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`990 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`060 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 540 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Exeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Seat Exeo, so Seat Exeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |