Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Seat Exeo engine produces 10 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 20 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.1 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| SAAB 9-3 2010 2.0 engine: The Saab B207 engine is essentially identical to the Opel Z20NET and is based on a 2.2-liter naturally aspirated predecessor. It is a simple and reliable engine, even less demanding than its predecessor. However, it has some notable weaknesses.
The timing and balance shaft chains have a limited lifespan and often stretch before reaching 200,000 km. The ... More about SAAB 9-3 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 351 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 109 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |