Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 90 HP less power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan 200 SX. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Cordoba) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but higher. Seat Cordoba is 38 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |