Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 26 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`923 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 307 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 307 quality is probably slightly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |