Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Seat Cordoba is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 235 NM | 177 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 13.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.4 | 9.7 | |
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.30 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but higher. Seat Cordoba is 24 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 241 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |