Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan 200 SX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Seat Cordoba is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 235 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 13.4 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.4 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but higher. Seat Cordoba is 38 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |