Seat Cordoba 1996 vs Citroen Xsara 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen Xsara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 68 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 235 NM | 112 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 13.4 seconds | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 9.4 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Seat Cordoba can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |