Seat Altea 2009 vs Mazda 3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Altea
2009 - 2015
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Seat Altea is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.2 - 2.01.3 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 85 - 211 HP84 - 265 HP
Torque: 130 - 350 NM122 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 15.1 seconds6.1 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 7.54.7 - 9.7
Seat Altea petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Seat Altea equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.42 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.60 m1.46 m
Seat Altea is larger.
Seat Altea is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Altea is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 532 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1229 litres
Seat Altea has more luggage capacity.
Seat Altea has 232 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`087~ 1`808
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 50001800
Pros and Cons: Seat Altea has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv