Rover 25 2002 vs Ford Fiesta 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 25 engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, but torque is 11 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.2 | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 25 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 25 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 25 is 7 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 25 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 947 litres | |
| Rover 25 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |