Rover 25 2004 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 25 engine produces 36 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Rover 25 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Rover 25 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 25 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Rover 25 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Land Rover Freelander, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Rover 25 is smaller. Rover 25 is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 25 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Rover 25 has 282 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 384 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 25 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 25 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |