Renault Twingo 2012 vs Smart ForFour 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 133 HP | 64 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 200 NM | 92 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 6.7 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Renault Twingo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour. On average, Renault Twingo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.69 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Twingo is 6 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Twingo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
959 litres | 910 litres | |
| Renault Twingo has 103 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`392 | ~ 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |