Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Audi Q3 2018

 
Renault Kadjar
2018 -
Audi Q3
2018 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 116 HP190 HP
Torque: 260 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds8 seconds
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Kadjar engine produces 74 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.6
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Kadjar consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 200 mm (7.9 inches)191 mm (7.5 inches)

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia DusterInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Audi Q3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ...  More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine 

Audi Q3 2018 2.0 engine: The Audi 2.0 TDI from the EA288 family (engine code DETA, 190 hp) is a modern diesel designed to combine good performance with efficiency. In general it has a solid reputation and, when properly maintained, can exceed 300,000 km. Nevertheless, like most contemporary ...  More about Audi Q3 2018 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.48 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.61 m1.62 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar and Audi Q3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 472 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1478 litres1525 litres
Audi Q3 has more luggage space.
Renault Kadjar has 58 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 47 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`994 kg2`280 kg
Net weight:1`547 kg1`695 kg
Load capacity:447 kg585 kg
Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Audi Q3. Therefore, Audi Q3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Audi Q3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 17 00028 400
Pros and Cons: Renault Kadjar has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi Q3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv