Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 18 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.0 | |
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
1500 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 537 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`249 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |