Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 2 NM less than Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1226 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 41 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |