Renault Clio 2008 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 6 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine Chevrolet Aveo 2004 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality. Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Aveo 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 64 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |