Renault Clio 2000 vs Ford Fiesta 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
| Renault Clio is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1035 litres | 930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`097 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 413 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Ford Fiesta. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |