Renault Clio 2000 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 106 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 8 HP less power than Peugeot 106, but torque is 3 NM more than Peugeot 106. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2000 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 40 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`385 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |