Renault Clio 2001 vs Dacia Logan 2008
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Dacia Logan, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 48 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Dacia Logan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Dacia Logan, so Dacia Logan quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |