Renault Captur 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.6 | |
| Renault Captur consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 27 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`744 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |